It was 2002 in Seattle, and a very good friend gave me the first “free range” eggs I ever had in my fridge. They were from her family’s very small farm, where they kept many dogs, cats, a donkey and some chickens. The chickens were not separated by male/female and the eggs had to be [...]
Posts Tagged ‘wrong’
Of what’s wrong with the new ‘Anonymous’ campaign as an example of how welfarism damages animals.-
Posted in Ethics, animal rights, animals, philosophy, rights, tagged animals, animal rights, past, vegan, humanity, humane, food, illogical, wrong, right, right from wrong, farm, rights, factory farms, organic, free range, damage on August 27, 2009 | Comments Off
- Of Blindness and Hypocrisy.
Posted in Ethics, animal rights, animals, philosophy, rights, tagged abuse, amazon, animal rights, animals, beef, Blindness, cow, crops, define, farm, food, global warming, grains, grazing, green tips, greenpeace, humanity, Hypocrisy, meat, methane, murder, product, right from wrong, rights, Tel Aviv, vegan, wrong on July 16, 2009 | Comments Off
If someone would be kind enough as to send me a link to a section in the Greenpeace site, offering real information about how we can help save our planet, I’d be most delighted to post it here. I just don’t think it needs to be so hard to find.
- Of how disconnected people are from the reality of the meat industry –
Posted in animal rights, animals, holocaust, rights, tagged abuse, animal rights, animals, holocaust, israel, products, right, right from wrong, rights, wrong on March 15, 2009 | Comments Off
We who take money from our little pockets and keep this mad industry running.
- Of Shooting Heroin and Eating Animals -
Posted in Belfast, Weimar, animal rights, animals, philosophy, tagged animal rights, animals, antibiotics, basic rights, beatles, conscience, consumerism, death, factoy farms, farm, GMO, heroin, intelligent, life, loneliness, love, murder, neutral, peace, rape, right, right from wrong, slavery, solitary confinement, Strawberry Fields Forever, veganism, violence, war, wrong on April 5, 2008 | Leave a Comment »
Most people would define themselves as being “good”. At best they are neutral (although if a person witnesses a crime and does nothing, is she/he still neutral?). If one walks this life with open eyes, if one is aware of the gruesome lives animals must endure, and still decides to not only to do nothing, but to contribute to this industry, then the “good” can not remain “good”, it is the opposite.